CHAMBER RULES & PROCEDURES

Decision-making in Zeqron is not a simple majority vote. It is a multi-dimensional consensus process designed to prevent governance capture and ensure technical integrity.

CHAMBER A: THE LATTICE ENGINEERS

The technical chamber. Admission is based on verifiable contributions to the zeqron-node core or peer-reviewed cryptographic research.

• ::ROLE: Technical white-listing of protocol upgrades.
• ::VETO_POWER: Can block any proposal that threatens the mathematical stability of the mesh.

CHAMBER B: THE SOVEREIGN COUNCIL

The ecosystem chamber. Representatives are elected by node operators based on stake and uptime.

• ::ROLE: Resource management and strategic direction.
• ::APPROVAL_THRESHOLD: Requires 67% consensus for grant allocations.

THE INDEPENDENT ARBITRATION

A rotating pool of 12 "Supreme Nodes" with high reputation scores. They act as the final check, verifying that all rules were followed during the voting cycle.

Consensus Bye-Laws // Zeqron Foundation Board